How AI recommendations work: scenarios → sources → why competitors win
Jump to
AI recommendations follow patterns.
They change with the scenario (the exact question).
They depend on sources AI can use (your site and third-party pages).
AI outputs three things: mentions, citations, and recommendations.
Competitors win when AI can explain them clearly and support the choice with proof.
Key takeaways
Track recommendations by scenario, not by brand-name prompts.
Win sources: strengthen your site pages and your third-party coverage.
Make your positioning simple. Add proof AI can cite.
Publish “best for”, “vs”, and “alternatives” content with criteria and trade-offs.
Measure weekly: visibility, share of voice, recommendation rate, and citation coverage.
The 3 outputs AI can give you
AI can treat your brand in three ways.
Track all three. They are not the same.
Mention
Citation
Recommendation
Mention
Definition: AI includes your brand name in the answer.
It may be in a list or in a sentence.
How to spot it: your brand name appears.
How to measure it: count mentions across your scenario set.
What “good” looks like: you appear in the top options for your buyer scenarios.
Citation
Definition: AI uses your pages as a source for a claim.
A link may be visible or not. It can also say “according to …”.
How to spot it: your domain or page is referenced.
How to measure it: track citation / source coverage across scenarios.
What “good” looks like: AI uses your pages to justify key points about you.
Recommendation
Definition: AI tells the user to choose your brand for a specific need.
It often uses “best for” language.
How to spot it: phrases like “choose”, “best for”, “I recommend”, “pick X if…”.
How to measure it: track recommendation rate across scenarios.
What “good” looks like: you are suggested for the right ICP and constraints.
Why this matters: Mentions are easiest. Citations build trust. Recommendations drive decisions.
Scenarios: why the question changes the answer
The question is not noise. It is the main input.
Small wording changes can change the result.
Scenario = intent + constraints
A scenario is a repeatable buyer question.
It has a fixed role, intent, and constraints.
How to define a scenario (step by step)
Pick a buyer role (your ICP).
Pick an intent: best, vs, alternatives, how-to, or definition.
Add constraints: budget, region, team size, must-have features.
Define success with a fixed format: top-3, criteria, trade-offs, and sources.
Scenario type | Example prompt (dentistry) | Output focus | What you measure | Best content to improve it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Definition | “What is a dental implant? Explain simply. Who is it for?” | Citation | Mentions + citations of your site/pages | Glossary pages (Implant, Crown, Root Canal) |
Best option | “Best dental clinic in [City] for implants. Give top 3 and why.” | Recommendation | Recommendation rate + list position | “Best for” landing pages + city pages |
Vs | “Dental implants vs bridge: which is better for a missing tooth?” | Recommendation | Which option AI recommends + reasons | Comparison pages with criteria + FAQ |
Alternatives | “Alternatives to braces for adults. What are options?” | Mention | Inclusion in option lists | Treatment options hub + guides |
How-to | “How does a root canal work? Steps, pain, recovery time.” | Citation | Citation coverage + step quality | Step-by-step procedure pages + recovery guides |
How AI builds an answer (simple flow)
Most answer engines follow a similar flow.
This is why AI visibility changes from one question to another.
The 5-step flow
Step 1: Detect intent
AI decides if the user wants a definition, a comparison, or a recommendation.
What you can do: create pages for “best / vs / alternatives”, not only generic posts.Step 2: Collect candidates
AI looks for information it can use.
It may pull from your site and from third-party sources.
What you can do: build strong first-party pages and grow consistent third-party coverage.Step 3: Select what to trust
AI favors content that is clear, consistent, and supported by proof.
Structure helps too (headings, lists, tables, FAQ).
What you can do: publish proof pages and improve page structure on key pages.Step 4: Synthesize an answer
AI combines the selected information into a single response.
It may simplify details.
What you can do: write short, direct statements and repeat the same wording across key pages.Step 5: Output a pattern
The answer becomes a mention, a citation, or a recommendation.
What you can do: track all three outputs across a stable scenario set.
A key point: the same brand can look different across prompts.
That is normal. Scenarios change which sources are selected.
How to measure this: track visibility, share of voice, recommendation rate, and citation coverage weekly.
The source layer (what AI pulls from)
Your homepage is not enough. AI pulls from many sources.
More good sources means more mentions, citations, and recommendations.
First-party sources (your site)
These are pages you control. They should be clear, structured, and consistent.
Core pages (must-have):
Homepage (what you do + best for)
About (who you are + credibility)
Pricing or Plans (constraints, limits, clarity)
Citable assets (high impact):
Glossary pages (definitions AI can reuse)
Methodology pages (how you measure or do the work)
Proof pages (case studies, results, policies)
Comparison pages (criteria + trade-offs + best for)
Why this matters:
First-party pages mostly drive citations. They also improve recommendations.
Third-party sources (reviews, directories, partner pages, guides)
AI also uses what others say about you.
This often drives trust and recommendations.
Start with these (in this order):
Reviews and ratings (highest trust signal)
Directories and listings (easy visibility wins)
Partner pages and industry guides (strong credibility)
Examples:
Review sites
Industry directories
Partner pages
Guest guides and expert roundups
Community discussions
Why this matters:
Third-party coverage often boosts recommendations and share of voice.
What makes a source usable (signals checklist)
Good signals:
Clear topic and clear brand/entity name
Specific claims with visible proof
Strong structure: headings, lists, FAQ, tables
Consistent wording across pages and sources
Updated signals when freshness matters (dates, “last updated”, clear ownership)
Bad signals:
Vague claims (“best”, “leading”) with no proof
Long blocks with no headings
Conflicting positioning across pages
Outdated or unclear pages
If sources are vague, AI hesitates. If sources are structured and consistent, AI uses them.
Why competitors win (7 common drivers) - improved, compact
Competitors usually win for simple reasons. Not because they “hack” the model.
These drivers impact mentions, citations, and recommendations.
The 7 drivers
Clear category + “best for”
AI can place them fast.
Quick fix: add one “Best for” section on your homepage.Proof pages that can be cited
AI can justify the recommendation.
Quick fix: publish one proof page per key claim (one claim → one proof).Strong comparisons
They answer “vs” questions directly.
Quick fix: publish one “X vs Y” page with 5 criteria + trade-offs.Consistent third-party coverage
Other sources repeat the same story.
Quick fix: update 10 listings/partner pages with the same positioning line.Better page structure
Headings, lists, and FAQs make extraction easy.
Quick fix: add “Definition + Steps + FAQ” to your top 3 pages.Reputation signals
Reviews and references reduce risk.
Quick fix: add a reviews/testimonials block and link to verified sources.Better scenario fit
They cover the exact intents buyers ask.
Quick fix: map 20 scenarios to pages (best / vs / alternatives) and fill the gaps.
Driver → what to publish → metric
Driver | What to publish (1 asset) | Metric it moves |
Category + best for | One-sentence positioning + “Best for” block | Recommendation rate |
Proof | 3 proof pages (case + methodology + policy) | Citation coverage |
Comparisons | 1 “vs” page + 1 “best tools” page | Position + recommendations |
Third-party coverage | 10 updated listings/partner pages | Share of voice |
Page structure | Definition + steps + FAQ on key pages | Mentions + citations |
Reputation | Reviews/testimonials + verified links | Recommendations |
Scenario fit | Scenario-to-page map (20 prompts) | Visibility score |
Competitor analysis in 60 seconds
Use this method first.
You can do it without tools.
Pick 10 buyer questions. Use best / vs / alternatives.
Run them in 2–3 answer engines.
Use the same output request each time: top 3 + short reasons + sources.
Write down who gets recommended for each question.
Write down which sources are cited or referenced.
Tag the winner’s main advantage: clarity / proof / coverage / structure / match.
Pick the top 3 repeated tags. Turn them into tasks.
If the same tag repeats, that is your real gap. Fix that first.
Video: How to analyze competitors fast (no manual work)
This video shows how to audit competitors in AI answers without spreadsheets.
No copying. No manual notes.
You get results in minutes.
Why you lose AI recommendations (the real reason)
Sometimes AI does not recommend you for one simple reason. It cannot explain you clearly.
Or it cannot prove your claims.
Or it cannot see that you fit the question.
That is the problem. Not “the algorithm”.
The 3 common gaps
Gap type | What AI says | What you want AI to say | What to do |
Clarity gap | “I’m not sure what they do.” | “They help [ICP] with [problem].” | Add one clear positioning line + “best for” section. Create 3–5 glossary pages. |
Proof gap | “No strong evidence.” | “They can do it because [proof].” | Publish proof pages: case, methodology, results, policies. Keep claims specific. |
Match gap | “Not a top pick for this question.” | “They are best for this use case.” | Publish “vs”, “best tools”, and “alternatives” pages with criteria and trade-offs. |
Fix order (simple rule)
Fix clarity first.
Then fix proof.
Then fix match.
If you skip clarity, AI will guess. If you skip proof, AI will avoid recommending you.
Next steps (make this useful right now)
If you read this article, you likely want one of two things.
You want to see where you lose to competitors.
Or you want to fix it fast.
Choose your next step based on your goal.
I want to find why competitors win (fast)
Run the Clarity / Proof / Match check on 10 buyer questions.
Then open the guide and fix the top gap first.
Go to: Clarity / Proof / Match guide
I want to measure AI visibility (repeatable)
Set up weekly tracking with a fixed list of buyer questions.
Use the same engines. Use the same format.
Track mentions, citations, and recommendations.
Go to: Measurement Methodology + Metrics Glossary
I want to improve my results (what to publish next)
Start with the highest-leverage assets:
one “Best for” section on your homepage,
3 proof pages (case + methodology + policy),
one comparison page (vs or best tools).
Go to: Playbooks Hub
I want to do this without manual work
Start a free trial and run competitor analysis automatically.
You will see who wins each buyer question and why.
You will also get recommended actions.
Start: Track AI visibility (free trial)
FAQ
Why do AI recommendations change from one question to another?
Because the intent changes.
“Best”, “vs”, and “alternatives” trigger different logic.
AI may also pick different sources each time.
What is a “buyer question” and why should I use it for tracking?
A buyer question is a real query a customer would ask before choosing.
It usually includes constraints like budget, location, or use case.
These questions predict recommendations better than brand-name prompts.
What are the fastest buyer question types to start with?
Start with three types:
best, vs, and alternatives.
They produce the clearest recommendation patterns.
Why do I sometimes see no links or sources in the answer?
Some systems show sources, some don’t.
That’s why you should track both:
who wins and what sources are used when visible.
When AI recommends a competitor, what should I check first?
Check two things first:
Do they have clearer “best for” positioning?
Do they have proof pages AI can lean on?
What does “clarity / proof / match” mean in practice?
Clarity: AI can explain what you do in one sentence.
Proof: AI can support claims with real pages or evidence.
Match: AI can place you as a best fit for this exact question.
How many buyer questions do I need for a useful competitor audit?
Start with 10.
If you want a stable baseline, use 20–30.
Keep the set the same week to week.
How do I pick the right competitors for AI answers?
Pick 5:
2 direct competitors, 2 category leaders, 1 “budget/default choice”.
This makes the comparison more realistic.
What output format should I request to reduce “noise” in results?
Use one fixed format:
top 3, short reasons, criteria, and sources (when possible).
Consistency makes changes easier to detect.
What should I do if AI mixes facts or says something incorrect?
Treat it as a signal.
It often means your positioning or sources are unclear.
Fix clarity first, then add proof pages that correct the claim.
What is the most common reason competitor analysis becomes useless?
Changing questions and format every time.
You need a stable buyer question set and a repeatable output format.
What is the best next action after I find the main reason competitors win?
Do one focused fix. Example: publish one proof page or one comparison page. Then re-check the same buyer questions next week.
